• Home
  • About
Friday, May 9, 2025
hrs@hemrajsingh.com
  • Login
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Personal
  • Crime File
  • Philosophy
  • Theory
  • People
  • Movies
  • Videos
  • EXCLUSIVE
  • More
    • General
    • Poetry
    • Relationships
    • Writing
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Philosophy

The invisible hand

HEMRAJ SINGH by HEMRAJ SINGH
June 8, 2015
in Philosophy
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0 0
1
The invisible hand
Share on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn

Who decides what one will be? In whose hands does one’s future lie? These are the questions that sound big and ring loud. Let’s try the smallest possible question. Who decides what one thinks? Now, anybody can answer this one. And nearly everyone would come up with a wrong reply, for the most obvious answer is not quite the answer. It is not the thinker who decides what he wants to think. He is only a means to the thought. The thought itself is the product of a number of factors that are not necessarily in control of the thinker.

We have deluded ourselves into believing that we are the doers. Our thoughts and our analyses are primarily determined by our surroundings. And in that sense we are essentially the products of our times.

The fact is that I would not think the way I do if I was born in a different setting, educated differently, was taught by different teachers and had a different value system at the core of my moral fabric. So, even my smallest and most insignificant thought is shaped by a number of influences merged together in unknown proportions.

Now, there could be many who could think the same thoughts about same issues, but that does not mean they derive the same conclusion on account of same or even similar upbringing and circumstances. Only the cumulative effect of all factors is same or similar, but the factors themselves are not. Like two plus three plus two plus three is ten, and so is five plus five, but the factors that add up to the result are individually different. This is why even if two people agree on one thing at one point of time, they would not agree on everything and every issue at all times.

You might also like

The ‘Protagoras Paradox of the Court’ Is A Non-Starter

Experience Is A Product Of Reason

Knowledge, Truth And Delusion

Gujarat 2002: The Unforgettable

Law, Morality and Limits of Reason

However, people who are brought up in the same setting and even in the same household tend to think differently, which indicates that the cloth soaks according to its own capacity, and does it selectively depending upon the material it is made of. So, what we end up being depends how our core composition responds to the surrounding circumstances, which is why the same social environment and setting has different effects on different people.

The hand that shapes us, thus, remains forever invisible.

So, I would never know what made me as dumb as I am. Alas!

First Published on my WordPress Blog on May 25, 2008

TweetSendShareShare
Previous Post

Spear, Armour and Socialist Democracy

Next Post

RANG DE BASANTI: What a synthetic nightmare!

HEMRAJ SINGH

HEMRAJ SINGH

HEMRAJ SINGH is a Delhi-based trial lawyer, specializing in both civil and criminal trials, and writes mainly on law, politics, crime, philosophy, policy, diplomacy and international relations. He is Editor-at-Large with Lawyers Update, a monthly magazine on law and legal affairs, and was Legal Editor with Universal Law Publishing Company before he started practicing law.

Related Posts

The ‘Protagoras Paradox of the Court’ Is A Non-Starter
Philosophy

The ‘Protagoras Paradox of the Court’ Is A Non-Starter

by HEMRAJ SINGH
August 8, 2015
Experience Is A Product Of Reason
Philosophy

Experience Is A Product Of Reason

by HEMRAJ SINGH
June 24, 2015
Knowledge, Truth And Delusion
Philosophy

Knowledge, Truth And Delusion

by HEMRAJ SINGH
June 23, 2015
Gujarat 2002: The Unforgettable
Personal

Gujarat 2002: The Unforgettable

by HEMRAJ SINGH
August 12, 2015
Next Post
RANG DE BASANTI: What a synthetic nightmare!

RANG DE BASANTI: What a synthetic nightmare!

Please login to join discussion

BROWSE BY CATEGORY

  • Crime File
  • General
  • Humour
  • Law
  • Movies
  • People
  • Personal
  • Philosophy
  • Poetry
  • Politics
  • Relationships
  • Society
  • Theory
  • Writing

About Hemraj Singh

HEMRAJ SINGH is a Delhi-based trial lawyer, specializing in both civil and criminal trials, and writes mainly on law, politics, crime, philosophy, policy, diplomacy and international relations. He is Editor-at-Large with Lawyers Update, a monthly magazine on law and legal affairs, and was Legal Editor with Universal Law Publishing Company before he started practicing law.

Categories

  • Crime File
  • General
  • Humour
  • Law
  • Movies
  • People
  • Personal
  • Philosophy
  • Poetry
  • Politics
  • Relationships
  • Society
  • Theory
  • Writing

Connect

hrs@hemrajsingh.com

Follow Us

© 2021. Designed by AK Network Solutions

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Personal
  • Crime File
  • Philosophy
  • Theory
  • People
  • Movies
  • Videos
  • EXCLUSIVE
  • More
    • General
    • Poetry
    • Relationships
    • Writing

© 2023 Designed by AK Network Solutions.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?