• Home
  • About
Friday, May 9, 2025
hrs@hemrajsingh.com
  • Login
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Personal
  • Crime File
  • Philosophy
  • Theory
  • People
  • Movies
  • Videos
  • EXCLUSIVE
  • More
    • General
    • Poetry
    • Relationships
    • Writing
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Personal

The Toxic Myth of Identity as a Hard Fact

Where identity, a malleable socio-political construct, does not serve a constructive public welfare purpose, the dangerous beast of identification is best left unprovoked.

HEMRAJ SINGH by HEMRAJ SINGH
March 8, 2023
in Personal
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
0
The Toxic Myth of Identity as a Hard Fact
Share on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn

Identity is astoundingly complicated, which is not always readily discernible, and has been known to foster conflicts; but in recent times, its midwifery of dissonance has scaled new heights and broken new grounds, necessitating a closer look at and a critical analysis of the idea of exclusive identity that forms the heart of most of the identity-driven conflicts. But before we get on with it, let me place on record my surprise at the need to even say it aloud that a human being is part of many more than a single class or group because for one to have to reiterate it, the world must be a bafflingly strange place. Or maybe the propagandist cacophony has temporarily crowded out such simple, unimpeachable but politically barren (or positively inconvenient) truths, requiring a periodical reminder of their existence and unassailability.

One is born into much of what goes into one’s identity — gender, race, religion, language, food and so on — and yet it isn’t destiny. One is always free to think for oneself, and opt out of much, if not all, of what one is born into. But even if one doesn’t, one’s identity is not a fully formed, indivisible whole; it’s formed by cultural layers, which stack up and intermingle to make a personality. The same cultural influences shape different people similarly as well as differently, but the multiplicity of identities within a human being continues to inform how he or she thinks, feels and responds to different things in the world, making a person a unique individual who fits into multiple groups, classes and brackets. The fusion of multiple cultural elements in a human being does not obliterate the different identities that continue to live in a person. At different points in life, different identities tend to dominate one’s life for different durations of time and for different reasons.

A Hindi-speaking, Hindu from Madhya Pradesh in Delhi is part of the majority in most respects, but will quickly find himself a part of the oppressed minority, if the sentiment against inter-state migrants flares up, like it keeps happening in Maharashtra every now and then. A Muslim in Delhi is in a different kind of minority whereas a Muslim migrant is part of two separate minority groups. An upper-caste Hindu from Delhi living in Delhi might look at himself or herself as part of the majority, but he or she belongs to a caste minority. A Tamil-speaking migrant in Delhi is a linguistic minority in addition to being part of the minority group of migrants. In some cases, the migrants might outnumber the natives, in which cases the natives are a minority in such regions.

Basically, almost everybody is a minority of one kind or the other depending upon where you draw the line. And that’s because we are many people rolled into one person. Individual identities are, for the most part, determined by self-identification, which is influenced, in large parts, by others’ perception and treatment of an individual.

You might also like

Weaponization of Unreason – VI

Weaponization of Unreason – V

Weaponization of Unreason – IV

Weaponization of Unreason – III

Weaponization of Unreason – II

When the treatment of an individual, or a group, or a class of people is oppressive on account of the general perception of the person, group, or class in question, the oppressors’ identification becomes the defining identity of the oppressed because the struggle against oppression eventually comes to center around such identity, and gets repeatedly reinforced by both the sides. That’s how an otherwise inconsequential aspect of one’s life becomes a large part of one’s lived reality. That’s the unconscionable social mechanism by which the mere accident of birth makes one person twice-born, god-like, learned, and worthy of universal veneration, and makes another impure and untouchable. Becoming a Hindu or a Muslim or a Christian is much the same, and while one can convert to another religion, few choose to, having socially and emotionally invested in one’s religion of birth.

Identity is not a hard fact in the world; it’s a malleable socio-political (or socio-politico-cultural) construct defined by mental borders rather than a real, tangible boundary. It can, therefore, be created and reinforced, and can just as well be diluted and dissolved by a change of perspective. It would just take an unhealthy dose of beverage fanaticism for coffee-drinkers and tea-drinkers to run amok and kill each other in the streets over coffee and tea exactly the same way as religion fanatics and the bloodthirsty mobs they instigate do over religion.

It is solely to administer substantive social and economic justice that people can be justifiably divided into identity groups for differential treatment, and only when and only if such differential treatment is both effective and necessary for the purpose as long as the substantive justice sought to be so administered does not cause injustice or excessive hardship to any other group of people, larger or smaller than the potential beneficiary group, notwithstanding, of course, the minor inconveniences and social anxieties that accompany all changes to the status quo.

Save for the limited purpose briefly outlined above, dividing people into identity groups does not lead to anything worthwhile, and is rarely used for any purposes other than introducing and mining societal polarization for political benefits, which can do little more than poison the roots of a democratic polity. Identification can both unite and divide, but where it does not serve a constructive public welfare purpose, the dangerous beast is best left unprovoked. In a diverse post-independence India, it’s a toxic substance that can be medicinal only on very rare occasions, if ever, and only in very small doses, if at all.

Originally published as part of my monthly column Street Lawyer in the May-July 2021 Issue of Lawyers Update (Vol XXVII, Part 5-7).

TweetSendShareShare
Previous Post

Spinning a Nightmare

Next Post

Seven Feet Apart – I

HEMRAJ SINGH

HEMRAJ SINGH

HEMRAJ SINGH is a Delhi-based trial lawyer, specializing in both civil and criminal trials, and writes mainly on law, politics, crime, philosophy, policy, diplomacy and international relations. He is Editor-at-Large with Lawyers Update, a monthly magazine on law and legal affairs, and was Legal Editor with Universal Law Publishing Company before he started practicing law.

Related Posts

Weaponization of Unreason – VI
Personal

Weaponization of Unreason – VI

by HEMRAJ SINGH
March 8, 2023
Weaponization of Unreason – V
Personal

Weaponization of Unreason – V

by HEMRAJ SINGH
March 8, 2023
Weaponization of Unreason – IV
Personal

Weaponization of Unreason – IV

by HEMRAJ SINGH
March 8, 2023
Weaponization of Unreason – III
Personal

Weaponization of Unreason – III

by HEMRAJ SINGH
March 8, 2023
Next Post
Seven Feet Apart – I

Seven Feet Apart - I

Please login to join discussion

BROWSE BY CATEGORY

  • Crime File
  • General
  • Humour
  • Law
  • Movies
  • People
  • Personal
  • Philosophy
  • Poetry
  • Politics
  • Relationships
  • Society
  • Theory
  • Writing

About Hemraj Singh

HEMRAJ SINGH is a Delhi-based trial lawyer, specializing in both civil and criminal trials, and writes mainly on law, politics, crime, philosophy, policy, diplomacy and international relations. He is Editor-at-Large with Lawyers Update, a monthly magazine on law and legal affairs, and was Legal Editor with Universal Law Publishing Company before he started practicing law.

Categories

  • Crime File
  • General
  • Humour
  • Law
  • Movies
  • People
  • Personal
  • Philosophy
  • Poetry
  • Politics
  • Relationships
  • Society
  • Theory
  • Writing

Connect

hrs@hemrajsingh.com

Follow Us

© 2021. Designed by AK Network Solutions

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Personal
  • Crime File
  • Philosophy
  • Theory
  • People
  • Movies
  • Videos
  • EXCLUSIVE
  • More
    • General
    • Poetry
    • Relationships
    • Writing

© 2023 Designed by AK Network Solutions.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?